But Li Qing told South Dan, in December 15th last year, police Ceng Kou put on its two host computer and books, which detail record each sweater of the actual sales price, but the New South Dan found books and computer did not transfer to the court, Li Qing still cling to one's view, the spot did not fill in the list of seizure.
The prosecutor's response is "unwarranted": "the existing evidence does not prove that the host is to let the police seizure."Li Qing's defense attorney, Wang Fukui believes it is the biggest omissions: "the actual sales price 446 wool sweater should be one by one, find out its average price can be used to calculate the amount of illegal business.
But the facts of the case are not clear, lack of evidence."To verify this,r4 flash card, reporter to then arrested Li Qing couples Erdos Public Security Bureau Detectation detachment,r4 games downloadJapan Fukuoka killing Chinese criminal was sentenced to death the robbers that rape, that day police Hao Yao sue for questioning, but two person to respond.
Erdos procuratorate prosecution department of Lv Bo said, she had handled the case, and the defendant said computer, books and other evidence requires the public security bureau to explain, but later she took maternity leave, do not know how to die.
Focus two why can use cross-province arrest?The case is another focus of discussion is that capture and inter-provincial trial.In August 3rd, Wang Fukui told the presiding judge submitted a "opinions of counsel", directed at the Public Security Bureau alleged illegal procedure of erdos.
China's "criminal law" twenty-fourth article: "criminal cases by the criminal jurisdiction of the people's court."The crime refers to the crime occurred, Li Qing's crime in the north of Chenzhou Lake region, Erdos is neither the crime, not the crime occurred, nor the result of crime occurrence.
At the same time, according to "the Supreme People's court,where to buy r4 cards, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the Ministry of public security on handling criminal cases of infringing intellectual property law applicable to a number of opinions", criminal cases of IPR infringement crime investigation by the public security organs.
Therefore, the Public Security Bureau of investigation right without erdos.But the court verdict on Erdos undertook give tit for tat response, crime of infringing upon intellectual property rights cases can the rights of the people by the actual infringement crime occurs to the public security organ for investigation.
The trademark owner Inner Mongolia Erdos Cashmere Products Limited company domicile of Erdos city is by the actual infringement crime results happen.February 21, 2010, the Ministry of public security of Economic Investigation Bureau issued "on the fake" Erdos "trademark jurisdiction issues notice" provisions, Erdos Detectation detachment, have the right to criminal investigation, the people's procuratorates, courts can also exercise the procuratorial power and judicial authority.
没有评论:
发表评论